Perhaps because writing is free, perhaps because one needs to feel in the center of attention, because it almost never is. I think it can be given because of the publicity that has some media figures who write and present a very auspicious the economic interests of many, then the writing becomes an interesting game.
Writing contains an aesthetic meaning that only a few believe understanding, writing does not mean into words thoughts or facts based on memory, beyond or rather must be more there because they choose a few. Many accept
Vallejo neologisms or their way of writing that was so criticized at the time, but today, you see with "good eyes" the daring, it is difficult to repeat history.
I did not know, but I figured that there was a permission to write, satisfaction a writer, they say, is to be read, for me is to express in words their feelings or opinion about something, I see it more as a therapy as a need for rewards or praise. No text
bad, just thought vulgar, because the quality of the text seen in the quality of interpretation and that does not put the author, but the reader.
Now what do people prefer to write to read? Although it is very difficult to overcome criticism for writing a few words and make it public, for me is because people have the need to be addressed and the views are reduced in the mouths of a few, want to express what can not daily lack of time and because they want to feel instigators of their own production, although for some it is impossible.
"Turn the world without leaving the same place" is the same as one does when he thinks deeply about things and read many books on the subject. I have found the experience of having thoughts that were born in my mind, but with the passage of time the writings of authors meeting in closed cases, which have never read before.
Suddenly you feel like you are in a place was inhabited by another person, which does not mean, as many think, it has been influenced by it, but it leaves me thinking about the possibility that there is a truth.
I ask myself, Does the road to truth is not that where two people who never knew, but they recognized?
I think reading is important, but not less than the writing, but in the qualifier and aesthetic context, I do appreciate the problem,
"many improvised and opportunistic poser publish their books and do not encourage deep thoughts in the readers. " is true and sadly ending, but I do not agree to overestimate the reading as the main source of knowledge for me is reflection.
is sad to see these issues in two presidential debates, as important and decisive in their respective times, they show us the decline in the quality of our politicians and presidents, the priority to rescue the stupid, cheap shots and morbidity before the state projects by the "journalists" and then those same journalists and publishers complain that in Peru there is no state policy and does not require quality people in their politicians. 
