I always wonder, does the majority rules is the reason for intelligent life?
Every time I look for a video on youtube or other websites showing videos of all kinds, I realize that the contents, perhaps more "content", are rarely viewed.
And are not things of the subjectivity of each individual, because these contents are based on the defense of, say, freedom of expression Who is going to deny that freedom of expression is not important at all countries of the world?
seems, according to figures from youtube, that most English-speaking people is not. In
my country, Peru, I have to endure not only programming populated cheap entertainment media and business concessions, coupled with a worrying journalism sold to private equity, I also see people who did something stupid ridiculous global Internet thus achieving its pseudo fame.
I can not believe that putting an old lady dressed in wild animal out of tune every note of the song is more important for people to talk containing a specific issue.
I do not try to say these things, more surprising that please, do not exist or are not seen, but a country can not be taken as the main source to a page Internet, by observation, shows a deep interest groups lacking on things.
television
If this phenomenon occurs, then why not eliminate beauty contests and reward the most visited girl in hi5? Or Do you get an award for best journalist's most visited blog owner?
Why anything goes on television or anything you can give? Does anyone can enter as well? Who invented that rule?
is a stupid question, the rules of the game imposed by the owners of the ball. And if television is not hard to imagine that is what attracts, apparently.
The television content, and they say much research on this in many countries, have some credibility influential caused by the relationship that man holds this environment from an early age, quite apart from the inspirations that cause the ideas of others on their own, which is a separate issue, but that occurs in the same way.
I can not believe that there are people that because they rose with a sense of knowing "what do you want people" looking for that and put in some seasons and sustain that is effective only because it put into a schedule with no choice to see on other channels.
And second, if you think that television have credibility, how do you explain that 3 Peruvian television channels have more viewers than others, and do not tell me it is for their programming.
And how do you explain the phrase "Panamera is Pan" as in football, "Brazil is Brazil," That's not credible?
What exists is a manipulation of content. These days no one should think about creating something with social meaning, let alone journalism, because it is boring, and this thanks to the pseudo-European vision of our culture made for years by the state channel.
Who rules then, people or four idiots? I believe that the four idiots.