What Wood Color Is Closest To Pecan

"The enemy of Peru is the lack of opportunity and the nonexistent national identity"

individualism, the idea that prevails in the human mind as the best tool for living more comfortable in a technological world "comfortable" leaves us many tacit concepts are similar not only mentally, but transformed into a logic of action and transmission.

Being different is to be recognized as such by "the other", but not by yourself, at least so if we apply the concept of "otherness."

But what if "the other" suddenly becomes an unbiased assessor of our actions and powers and is only intended to point out our mistakes.

happens that "other" for us, becomes an enemy, a person who does not want to see how good we are as people, who want what we have materially and not content to spew what you can, seeks to destroy.

then that "other" becomes our enemy, but why enemy and not to compete, if we talk about two people of different nationalities, could be considered as such, but if both have the same nationality is a social problem.

may wonder Is not good for a nation to recognize the authority of the citizens?

"The enemy of Peru is another Peruvian" is a phrase that encompasses the entire behavior in frustration, envy, segregation, Mezquides, few resources, need, exploitation, abuse, corruption, neglect , exclusion, abuse, hypocrisy, etc.

What is surprising is the acceptance of this phrase in Peruvian society, going to become a social law and even in a conditional to emerge and succeed in life, always within Peru.

Because the physical context of this phrase is the Peruvian, say, "in Peru of a Peruvian enemy is another Peruvian, then Who does this situation change?

All eyes point to politics, politicians, the ruling class "The Other" - capitalized - is responsible for unifying society by providing opportunities, highlighting the talented, developing investment, including repratriando, while recognizing corrupted, etc.

corrupt politics, or current, is one of the culprits so that such phrases are developed using logical, not only with theory building, but through practice, this is one reason more for why education must change methods.

Theoretically says one thing, however in practice the opposite happens, this added to what is seen daily in the media by attaching our personal experiences with these events.

The tacit agreement is clear and the attitude of people is pure logic as those experiences.

What surprises me is the negligence with which it is the political destiny of a country, education, public management and private rules.

If this sentence is so accepted then what hope development? What development or talk to analysts, the media and advertising?

Happy July 28th ... Celebrating our disunity and lacking identification with Peru ... by Of course, these issues are touched inadvertently or in the media nor the political discourse.